Monday, 14 October 2013

Unit 43.2/Interpreting my results


I asked the public ‘Do you think the majority of dog attacks happen due to how the dog has been brought up? ’Eleven out of fifteen of them think that dogs should be licensed to help stop a lot of dog attacks from happening. However the ones that said they shouldn’t have a license had no evidence to support why they thought that. 
Another question i asked the public was public was 'what do you think needs to happen to bring the risk of a dog attack from happening?'
The majority of the people I asked said that all dogs should be licensed. The results I got I were really happy with, this was because some of the answers I got were things like, ‘they should be muzzled’ or ‘they should be trained correctly’. I got in depth answers and the majority of them were ways of reducing dogs attacking young children, which i was pleased with as hardly anyone just said yes or no.
In conclusion, from the results I got from the whole questionnaire, I am really happy with the results I got. I feel some of the people I asked had no idea what they were talking about and answered the questions based on a guess. Overall, the final question I asked the public was ‘To avoid the risk of young children being attacked, do you think that all dogs should be licensed? I asked a total of 15 people, and 11 of them said yes and gave a reason why. The other 4 people that said no had no evidence to support it, so to me this shows that didn't really know much about the subject, couldn't be bothered with the questionnaire or didn't really understand the question.










No comments:

Post a Comment